6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from St. Petersburg Housing Auth. v. Jr Dev..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Petersburg Housing Auth. v. Jr Dev. Anchor | green | “this procedure improperly allows appellee a 'second bite at the apple' at proving damages, an element of proof that should have been proven at trial” | 3 |
| 2 | MONTAGE GROUP v. Athle-Tech Computer Sys. | green | “the plaintiff bears the burden of proving an entitlement to lost profits.” | 3 |
| 3 | Lindon v. Dalton Hotel Corp. | green | “in restoring the injured party to the 'same position,' he 'is not entitled to be placed, because of that breach, in a position better than that which he would have occupied had the contract been performed.” | 3 |
| 4 | James Crystal Licenses, LLC v. Infinity Radio Inc. | green | “the plaintiff bears the burden of proving an entitlement to lost profits.” | 3 |
| 5 | Verandah Development, LLC v. Gualtieri | green | “misapprehends the purpose of a damages award on a breach-of-contract claim, which” | 3 |
| 6 | Allard v. Al-Nayem International, Inc. | green | “involuntary dismissal is proper where there is inadequate proof at trial on the correct measure of damages.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.