4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Husch v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Husch v. State Anchor | green | “moreover, if the solicitor had had such a statement in his possession, defendant could have required its production by a rule of the court if he thought it was favorable to him.” | 7 |
| 2 | Cooks v. State | green | “of such nature that without it the defendant's trial would be fundamentally unfair.” | 5 |
| 3 | Cooks v. State | green | “moreover, if the solicitor had had such a statement in his possession, defendant could have required its production by a rule of the court if he thought it was favorable to him.” | 4 |
| 4 | Strange v. State | green | “once the defendant has laid a proper predicate for the impeachment of a witness who testified before the grand jury, the trial judge should conduct an in camera inspection as outlined in palermo, supra, and pate, supra, to determine (1) whether the statement made by the witness …” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.