4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. Anchor | green | “the statute was meant to prevent wrongful acts of culpable officers of a corporation, and was for the protection of the public and particularly those dealing with the corporation.” | 9 |
| 2 | Dae Won Choe v. Chancellor, Inc. | green | “the plain and ordinary meaning of the words in section 171.255,” | 3 |
| 3 | Carbide International, Ltd. v. State | green | “procedural safeguards may now be conceived to be more suitable than the safeguard of strict construction to protect the interests of individuals in not being subjected to undeserved punishment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. | green | “must be strictly construed and not extended beyond the clear import of its literal language.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.