4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morgan v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation Anchor | green | “the director may accept or reject as much or as little of a witness's testimony as he pleases.” | 6 |
| 2 | Morgan v. Department of Financial & Professional Regulation | green | “reevaluate witness credibility or resolve conflicting evidence,' but rather to determine only 'whether the findings of fact are supported by the manifest weight of the evidence.” | 5 |
| 3 | DUTTALA OBULA REDDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees | green | “we must defer to the administrative agency's expertise and experience in determining what sanction is appropriate to protect the public interest.” | 4 |
| 4 | Heabler v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation | green | “it is for the director, as the trier of fact, to evaluate all evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, resolve any conflicts in the evidence, and draw reasonable inferences and conclusions from the facts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.