5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Rodriguez Anchor | green | “a determination whether a juror is . . . grossly unqualified, and subsequently to discharge such a juror, is left to the broad discretion of the court” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Harris | green | “probing and tactful inquiry' into the facts of the situation” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Harris | green | “a probing and tactful inquiry' into the facts of the situation” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Chatt | green | “the decision to disqualify turns on the facts of each particular case,” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Fayette | green | “are supported by both circumstantial and direct evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.