5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kalata v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kalata v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. Anchor | green | “the court on review must not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.” | 7 |
| 2 | Martin-Trigona v. Roderick | green | “by agreeing to the venue set forth in the venue clause, the parties necessarily waived or forfeited objection.” | 3 |
| 3 | Martin-Trigona v. Roderick | green | “lessee further consents and waives venue or other objections to lessor instituting any action under this lease in any circuit court of illinois.” | 3 |
| 4 | American Access Casualty Company v. Reyes | green | “we exercise 'sparingly' the power to declare a private contract void as against public policy.” | 3 |
| 5 | Hussein v. L.A. Fitness International, L.L.C | green | “strongly favors freedom to contract” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.