3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury Anchor | green | “in the foia context, the agency is the 'client' and the agency's lawyers are the 'attorneys' for the purposes of attorney-client privilege.” | 8 |
| 2 | Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the Treasury | green | “the agency is the 'client' and the agency's lawyers are the 'attorneys' for the purposes of attorney-client privilege.” | 6 |
| 3 | Jordan v. United States Department of Labor | green | “the agency must establish that the withheld records are (1) commercial or financial, (2) obtained from a person, and (3) privileged or confidential.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.