3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates Anchor | green | “while discovery determinations rest within the sound discretion of the trial court, the appellate division is vested with a corresponding power to substitute its own discretion for that of the trial court, even in the absence of abuse” | 12 |
| 2 | Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates | green | “on a case-by-case basis with due regard for the strong policy supporting open disclosure,” | 3 |
| 3 | Murphy v. Hamilton | green | “upon objection by a person entitled to assert the privilege, privileged matter shall not be obtainable” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.