6 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Microsoft Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. Anchor | green | “that barrier ... stems from two characteristics of the software market: (1) most consumers prefer operating systems for which a large number of applications have already been written; and (2) most developers prefer to write for operating systems that already have a substantial c…” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. | green | “a prima facie showing that the deals have an anticompetitive effect,” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. | green | “applications barrier to entry.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. | green | “interim restrictions on microsoft's conduct.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. | green | “nearly identical to plaintiffs' proposal” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Microsoft Corp. | green | “restriction on binding middleware products to operating system products' unless microsoft also offers consumers 'an otherwise identical version' of the operating system without the middleware,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.