6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Lewie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Lewie Anchor | green | “afraid the victim would not want to be with” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Roe | green | “very healthy, normal lifestyle,” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Graham | green | “this calculus requires an objective assessment of the degree of risk presented by defendant's reckless conduct” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Coon | green | “wanton cruelty, brutality, or callousness” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Boutin | green | “a person is guilty of reckless endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he or she recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Boutin | green | “reflect wanton cruelty, brutality or callousness directed against a particularly vulnerable victim, combined with utter indifference to the life or safety of the helpless target of the perpetrator's inexcusable acts” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.