6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonald Anchor | green | “any competent material evidence.” | 4 |
| 2 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Barnett | green | “when an attorney's conduct impacts negatively the public's perception or efficacy of the courts or legal profession.” | 3 |
| 3 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlin | green | “conducts an independent review of the record.” | 3 |
| 4 | Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Thompson | green | “given that respondent did not present further evidence in the record to reveal that the hearing judge's findings were clearly erroneous, we reject respondent's factual exceptions.” | 3 |
| 5 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Peters-Hamlin | green | “disbarment is ordinarily the sanction for intentional dishonest conduct” | 3 |
| 6 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bellamy | green | “to be reasonable, the fees must be commensurate with the legal services provided.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.