3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth. Anchor | green | “clear showing that four factors, taken together, warrant relief: likely success on the merits, likely irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, a balance of the equities in its favor, and accord with the public interest.” | 9 |
| 2 | Jaskirat Singh v. David Berger | green | “merge when, as here, the government is the opposing party.” | 6 |
| 3 | Workman v. Bissessar | green | “bears the burden of producing credible evidence sufficient to demonstrate its entitlement to injunctive relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.