6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Personal Restraint of Greening.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Personal Restraint of Greening Anchor | green | “where an intervening opinion has effectively overturned a prior appellate decision that was originally determinative of a material issue.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Yokley | green | “that a deportation proceeding that occurs subsequent to the entry of a guilty plea is merely a collateral consequence of that plea.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Personal Restraint of Turay | green | “simply applies settled law to new facts, it does not constitute a significant change in the law.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Evans | green | “are those that 'break new ground or impose a new obligation on the states or the federal government or if the result was not dictated by precedent existing at the time the defendant's conviction became final.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Sandoval | green | “anything short of an affirmative misrepresentation by counsel of the plea's deportation consequences could not support the plea's withdrawal.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Martinez-Lazo | green | “concluded that the sixth amendment did not require attorneys to inform their clients of a conviction's collateral consequences, including deportation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.