3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 128 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Villarreal v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Villarreal v. State Anchor | green | “such a charge is one that accurately sets out the law, is authorized by the indictment, does not unnecessarily increase the state's burden of proof or unnecessarily restrict the state's theories of liability, and adequately describes the particular offense for which the defendan…” | 110 |
| 2 | Kuciemba v. State | green | “circumstantial evidence is as probative as direct evidence in establishing the guilt of the actor, and circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to establish guilt.” | 12 |
| 3 | Guzman v. State | green | “that is, the accused must have intended the result, death, or have been aware that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause that result.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.