5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Science Applications International Corp. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Science Applications International Corp. v. United States Anchor | green | “the agency inconsistently applied objective solicitation requirements between it and other offerors, such as proposal page limits, formatting requirements, or submission deadlines,” | 5 |
| 2 | Fulcra Worldwide, LLC v. United States | green | “if an agency commits itself to a particular methodology in the solicitation, it must follow that methodology.” | 4 |
| 3 | Linc Government Services, LLC v. United States | green | “clear evidence of material that was generated or considered by the agency but excluded from the record.” | 3 |
| 4 | Tech Systems, Inc. v. United States | green | “recognizes that the 'business judgments and tradeoffs' of others may be 'relied on by the ssa.” | 3 |
| 5 | JWK International Corp. v. United States | green | “limited to determining whether the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.