4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. Anchor | green | “detailed set of rules for determining” | 5 |
| 2 | Ind. Elec. Workers Pension Benefit Fund v. Manweb Servs., Inc. | green | “a desire to (1) relieve the financial burden placed upon remaining contributors to a multiemployer fund when one or more of them withdraws from the plan; (2) avoid creating a severe disincentive to new employers entering the plan; and (3) prevent the creation of funding deficien…” | 4 |
| 3 | Ind. Elec. Workers Pension Benefit Fund v. Manweb Servs., Inc. | green | “employer withdrawal liability will help to insulate a plan from the adverse effects of a sustained decline in the contribution base.” | 4 |
| 4 | Ind. Elec. Workers Pension Benefit Fund v. Manweb Servs., Inc. | green | “the mppaa amended erisa to protect multiemployer plans from these damaging consequences of withdrawal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.