3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Conseco Life Insurance v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conseco Life Insurance v. Williams Anchor | green | “when the movant makes a prima facie showing of entitlement to a summary judgment, the respondent must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof by showing a genuine issue as to a material fact.” | 7 |
| 2 | Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of Wynne | green | “when the movant makes a prima facie showing of entitlement to a summary judgment, the respondent must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof by showing a genuine issue as to a material fact.” | 7 |
| 3 | Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of Wynne | green | “must discard the shielding cloak of formal allegations and meet proof with proof by showing a genuine issue as to a material fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.