4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weinbaum v. City of Las Cruces, NM.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weinbaum v. City of Las Cruces, NM Anchor | green | “we review de novo a district court's findings of constitutional fact and its ultimate conclusions regarding a first amendment challenge.” | 5 |
| 2 | Weinbaum v. City of Las Cruces, NM | green | “whether the government conduct was motivated by an intent to endorse religion.” | 5 |
| 3 | Phillip L. Foremaster v. City of St. George, a Political Subdivision of the State of Utah | green | “to demonstrate standing, a plaintiff must allege actual or threatened personal injury, fairly traceable to the defendant's unlawful conduct and likely to be redressed by a favorable decision of the court.” | 4 |
| 4 | American Atheists, Inc. v. Duncan | green | “may not necessarily share the same sensitivity to the symbol of the cross as a jewish family.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.