Topic: if the proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim un… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #23610

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft Corporation.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft Corporation Anchor
ca4 · 1980
green “if the proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim under the applicable rules and accompanying standards,” 8
2 Tawwaab v. Virginia Linen Service, Inc.
mdd · 2010
green “at least some of the evidence needed for a plaintiff to prove his or her claim did not come to light until after the amendment deadline,” 3
3 Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.
mdd · 1999
green “a court's scheduling order 'is not a frivolous piece of paper, idly entered, which can be cavalierly disregarded by counsel without peril.” 3
4 Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.
mdd · 1999
green “frivolous piece of paper, idly entered, which can be cavalierly disregarded by counsel without peril.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check