3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shaw v. Valdez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shaw v. Valdez Anchor | green | “well-pleaded factual allegations” | 8 |
| 2 | Shoultz v. Monfort Of Colorado | green | “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 6 |
| 3 | Shaw v. Valdez | green | “must accept as true the plaintiff's well-pleaded factual allegations and all reasonable inferences must be indulged in favor of the plaintiff.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.