5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co. Anchor | green | “a shareholder's derivative suit seeks to recover for the benefit of the corporation and its whole body of shareholders when injury is caused to the corporation that may not otherwise be redressed because of failure of the corporation to act.” | 5 |
| 2 | Okada v. Mgic Indemnity Corp. | green | “if an action against the directors incorporates both covered and uncovered claims, the parties must apportion the costs so that mgic need only pay for amounts generated in defense of covered claims.” | 3 |
| 3 | Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave Swiekert | green | “if a reasonable jury viewing the summary judgment record could find by a preponderance of the evidence thatappellants are entitled to a verdict in their favor, then summary judgment was inappropriate.” | 3 |
| 4 | Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co. | green | “the collateral source rule, if applied to an action based on breach of contract, would violate the contractual damage rule that no one shall profit more from the breach of an obligation than from its full performance.” | 3 |
| 5 | Plut v. Fireman's Fund Insurance | green | “found no case expressly applying this rule in circumstances resembling those before them, and the overwhelming weight of authority in california and other jurisdictions has rejected the extension of the collateral source rule to breach of contract.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.