3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rri Realty Corp. v. Village Of Southampton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rri Realty Corp. v. Village Of Southampton Anchor | green | “even if in a particular case, objective observers would estimate that the probability of issuance was extremely high, the opportunity of the local agency to deny issuance suffices to defeat the existence of a federally protected property interest.” | 7 |
| 2 | Rri Realty Corp. v. Village Of Southampton | green | “only when the discretion of the issuing agency is so narrowly circumscribed that approval of a proper application is virtually assured.” | 6 |
| 3 | Southview Associates, Ltd. v. Bongartz | green | “denial by a local zoning authority violates substantive due process standards only if the denial 'is so outrageously arbitrary as to constitute a gross abuse of governmental authority” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.