2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from White Tail Park, Incorporated v. Stroube.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White Tail Park, Incorporated v. Stroube Anchor | green | “such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to warrant his invocation of federal court jurisdiction and to justify exercise of the court's remedial powers on his behalf.” | 9 |
| 2 | CGM, LLC v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. | green | “an integral component of the case or controversy requirement.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.