3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gwendolyn Donald v. Sybra, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gwendolyn Donald v. Sybra, Incorporated Anchor | green | “the pwdcra substantially mirrors the ada, and resolution of a plaintiff's ada claim will generally, though not always, resolve the plaintiff's pwdcra claim.” | 7 |
| 2 | Gwendolyn Donald v. Sybra, Incorporated | green | “substantially mirrors the ada, and resolution of a plaintiff's ada claim will generally, though not always, resolve the plaintiff's pwdcra claim.” | 6 |
| 3 | Chiles v. Machine Shop, Inc | green | “the michigan court of appeals and the michigan supreme court have noted that the federal ada and the pwdcra share the same purpose and use similar definitions and analyses, and both courts have relied on the ada in interpreting the pwdcra.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.