4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 126 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. Anchor | green | “there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.” | 47 |
| 2 | EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson | green | “the test for abuse of discretion is whether the trial court acted without reference to any guiding rules or principles.” | 40 |
| 3 | EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson | green | “subjective belief or unsupported speculation.” | 29 |
| 4 | Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc. | green | “experience alone may provide a sufficient basis for an expert's testimony” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.