3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from George Ford Mary A. Ford v. General Motors Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | George Ford Mary A. Ford v. General Motors Corporation Anchor | green | “demonstrating that the nonmoving party lacks evidence to support an essential element of its case.” | 10 |
| 2 | Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc. | green | “we have repeatedly cautioned against inferring causation based on temporal proximity alone.” | 4 |
| 3 | Tuttle v. Baptist Health Med. Grp., Inc. | green | “where some time elapses between when the employer learns of a protected activity and the subsequent adverse employment action, the employee must couple temporal proximity with other evidence of retaliatory conduct to establish causality.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.