4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Pohl.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Pohl Anchor | green | “in the absence of a determination of what the files would have shown we cannot hold there was no prejudice.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Aragon | green | “in order to exercise discretion properly, it follows that the facts and circumstances surrounding an issue must be sufficiently set forth to render a reasoned decision.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Fekete | green | “a claim that the police coerced a statement requires a different analysis than a claim that an accused voluntarily waived his or her fifth amendment protections under miranda.” | 3 |
| 4 | Chacon v. State | green | “ondisclosure of items material to the preparation of the defense is not reversible error in the absence of prejudice.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.