2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mobley v. Central Intelligence Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobley v. Central Intelligence Agency Anchor | green | “a search, under foia, is not unreasonable simply because it fails to produce all relevant material.” | 9 |
| 2 | Hodge v. Federal Bureau of Investigation | green | “the adequacy of a search is determined not by the fruits of the search, but by the appropriateness of its methods.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.