4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Langschmidt v. Langschmidt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langschmidt v. Langschmidt Anchor | green | “retirement benefits accrued during the marriage clearly are marital property under tennessee law.” | 6 |
| 2 | Langschmidt v. Langschmidt | green | “the appreciation of a spouse's ira during the marriage is separate property when funded completely with premarital earnings and absent substantial contribution by the other spouse to the preservation and appreciation of the ira.” | 5 |
| 3 | Umstot v. Umstot | green | “all of husband's retirement plan, except 4,437.00, accrued during the marriage.” | 3 |
| 4 | Umstot v. Umstot | green | “the critical determination is whether the value 'accrued' during the marriage.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.