4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Capital Promotions, L.L.C. v. Don King Productions, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capital Promotions, L.L.C. v. Don King Productions, Inc. Anchor | green | “where a forum seeks to assert specific jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has not consented to suit there, due process is satisfied if the defendant has 'purposefully directed' his activities at residents of the forum and the litigation results from alleged injuries…” | 5 |
| 2 | A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, Lp | green | “refers to the power of a state to adjudicate any cause of action involving a particular defendant, regardless of where the cause of action arose.” | 5 |
| 3 | Samir M. Shams v. Sona Hassan | green | “if sufficient minimum contacts exist, the court must then determine whether the assertion of personal jurisdiction would comport with fair play and substantial justice.” | 4 |
| 4 | Samir M. Shams v. Sona Hassan | green | “fairness is the crux of the minimum-contacts analysis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.