4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Moore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Moore Anchor | green | “the indictment in a kidnapping case must allege the purpose or purposes upon which the state intends to rely, and the state is restricted at trial to proving the purposes alleged in the indictment.” | 7 |
| 2 | State v. Moore | green | “since kidnapping is a specific intent crime, the state must prove that the defendant unlawfully confined, restrained, or removed the person for one of the eight purposes set out in the statute.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Wooten | green | “a killing is committed in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of another felony when there is no break in the chain of events between the felony and the act causing death, so that the felony and homicide are part of the same series of events, forming one continuous transa…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.