3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Elston.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Elston Anchor | green | “an error is deemed to have been 'outcome determinative' if it undermined the reliability of the verdict.” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Mateo | green | “in light of the weight and strength of the untainted evidence.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Mateo | green | “focuses on the nature of the error and assesses its effect in light of the weight and strength of the untainted evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.