3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of Allegheny.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Anchor | green | “indicate the spirit and motivation behind the drafting of the rule, and they serve as guidelines for understanding the purpose for which the rule was drafted” | 7 |
| 2 | Womer v. Hilliker | green | “we incorporated equitable considerations in the form of a doctrine of substantial compliance into rule 126, giving the trial courts the latitude to overlook any 'procedural defect' that does not prejudice a party's rights.” | 5 |
| 3 | Touloumes v. E.S.C. Inc. | green | “effective october 1, 2021, "rule” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.