4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thompson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thompson v. State Anchor | green | “the record in this case contains nothing to suggest that thompson fell within this exception to the general rule.” | 3 |
| 2 | Shakes v. State | green | “in addition, the trial court never entered a written finding of competency, further indicating that the trial court did not make an independent competency determination.” | 3 |
| 3 | Antonio Jermaine Presley v. State of Florida | green | “in fact, it is unclear from the record whether the trial court actually reviewed the expert's report declaring appellant competent to proceed.” | 3 |
| 4 | Robert L. Rumph v. State | green | “one requirement of a proper hearing is that the trial court actually reviews the expert reports and other evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.