4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cahill v. TRIBOROUGH.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cahill v. TRIBOROUGH Anchor | green | “plaintiff had adequate safety devices available; that he knew both that they were available and that he was expected to use them; that he chose for no good reason not to do so; and that had he not made that choice he would not have been injured” | 8 |
| 2 | Geraci v. Probst | green | “arguments were sufficient to alert the court to the relevant question and sufficiently preserved the legal issue for appellate review” | 3 |
| 3 | Klotz v. Warick | green | “a clear record articulating defendant's claimed objections to the court's refusal to charge the jury as requested,” | 3 |
| 4 | Sung Kyu-To v. Triangle Equities | green | “viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to . . . plaintiff and affording him the benefit of every favorable inference, we conclude that the evidence adduced at trial provided a rational basis upon which the jury could have determined” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.