5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alltop v. Alltop.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alltop v. Alltop Anchor | green | “due process requires that before criminal sanctions may be imposed upon a respondent as a result of indirect criminal contempt proceedings, notice must be provided to the alleged contemnor that such sanctions are being sought and might be imposed.” | 4 |
| 2 | Alltop v. Alltop | green | “requirement can be met by entitling the initial pleading, 'petition for adjudication of criminal contempt.” | 4 |
| 3 | In re Marriage of Betts | green | “accorded due process of law with respect to the contempt charges.” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re Marriage of Cummings | green | “in a civil contempt proceeding, the contemnor is only entitled to minimal due process, consisting of notice and an opportunity to be heard.” | 3 |
| 5 | Alltop v. Alltop | green | “a pleading entitled 'petition for rule to show cause' is not sufficient to provide the due process to which an alleged criminal contemnor is entitled.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.