5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Gissendanner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Gissendanner Anchor | green | “suggestiveness' is not a concern” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Grice | green | “when a person in custody requests to speak to an attorney or when an attorney who is retained to represent the suspect enters the matter under investigation” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Davis | green | “single reference to defendant's right to appeal is insufficient to establish that the court engaged the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Foster | green | “was not retained 'in the matter at issue” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Kirk | green | “the record of the suppression hearing supports the court's determination that the statements at issue were not rendered involuntary by reason of any alleged coercion by the police” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.