4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lord v. Apfel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lord v. Apfel Anchor | green | “for a reviewing court to be satisfied that an alj's decision was supported by substantial evidence, that decision must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lord v. Apfel | green | “an alj may not simply ignore relevant evidence, especially when that evidence supports a claimant's cause.” | 5 |
| 3 | Dube v. Astrue | green | “an alj may not simply ignore relevant evidence, especially when that evidence supports a claimant's cause.” | 4 |
| 4 | Lord v. Apfel | green | “alj's written decision need not directly address every piece of evidence in the administrative record” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.