4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from HUONG QUE, INC. v. Luu.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HUONG QUE, INC. v. Luu Anchor | green | “an appellate court ' "must presume that the record contains evidence to support every finding of fact . . . .” | 5 |
| 2 | Claudio v. Regents of University of Cal. | green | “cannot shift this burden onto respondent, nor is a reviewing court required to undertake an independent examination of the record when appellant has shirked his responsibility in this respect.” | 4 |
| 3 | Pope v. Babick | green | “appellants' 'fundamental obligation to this court, and a prerequisite to our consideration of their challenge' , is to 'set forth the version of events most favorable to respondent” | 4 |
| 4 | Toste v. CalPortland Construction | green | “we do not review the evidence to see if there is substantial evidence to support the losing party's version of events, but only to see if substantial evidence exists to support the verdict in favor of the prevailing party.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.