5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow Anchor | green | “when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” | 4 |
| 2 | Brunner Firm Co. v. Bussard, 07ap-867 (9-16-2008) | green | “an action may be rendered moot when the litigant receives the relief sought before completion of the lawsuit.” | 4 |
| 3 | State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow | green | “a '"case is moot when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.” | 3 |
| 4 | M.R. v. Niesen | green | “must dismiss the case as moot.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Consilio | green | “conversely, if an actual controversy exists because it is possible for a court to grant the requested relief, the case is not moot, and a consideration of the merits is warranted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.