3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Holmes v. Federal Election Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holmes v. Federal Election Commission Anchor | green | “the district of columbia circuit has suggested that a positive showing on all four preliminary injunction factors may be required.” | 7 |
| 2 | Anatol Zukerman v. USPS | green | “when the defendant is the government, factors (3) and (4) merge.” | 6 |
| 3 | Cal. Ass'n of Private Postsecondary Sch. v. DeVos | green | “makes clear that a mere 'possibility' of irreparable harm will not suffice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.