3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amanda Sumpter v. Wayne Cty..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amanda Sumpter v. Wayne Cty. Anchor | green | “shields governmental officials from monetary damages as long as their actions did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” | 7 |
| 2 | Goodwin Ex Rel. Nall v. City of Painesville | green | “there need not be a case with the exact same fact pattern or even 'fundamentally similar' or 'materially similar' facts,” | 5 |
| 3 | Amanda Sumpter v. Wayne Cty. | green | “as long as their actions did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.