2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lackner v. Glosser.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lackner v. Glosser Anchor | green | “arguments which are not appropriately developed are waived.” | 14 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Noss | green | “arguments which are not appropriately developed are waived.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.