2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from E.D. v. M.P..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E.D. v. M.P. Anchor | green | “disputes relating to child custody matters” | 10 |
| 2 | C.M.K. v. K.E.M. | green | “a change in residence of the child which significantly impairs the ability of a non-relocating party to exercise custodial rights.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.