5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Taylor v. Kennedy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor v. Kennedy Anchor | green | “must be asserted in the court of claims, not within a cplr article 78 proceeding” | 5 |
| 2 | Alvarez v. Fischer | green | “supreme court erred in transferring that part of the proceeding related to the . . . grievances to this court inasmuch as any determinations with respect to those grievances were not made as a result of a hearing held . . . pursuant to direction by law” | 3 |
| 3 | Hodges v. Jones | green | “incidental to the primary relief sought by petitioner” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Jackson | green | “address the contentions with respect thereto in the interest of judicial economy” | 3 |
| 5 | Abdullah v. Girdich | green | “to establish that any of the exceptions to the exhaustion doctrine applied” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.