4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Schwimmer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Schwimmer Anchor | green | “proud- est boast of our free speech jurisprudence” | 4 |
| 2 | Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc | green | “this case is distinguishable from the colorado civil rights division's recent findings that the other bakeries in denver did not discriminate against a christian patron on the basis of his creed” | 4 |
| 3 | Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc | green | “affirm . . . a belief with which he disagrees,” | 4 |
| 4 | Mullins v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc | green | “an endorsement of same-sex marriage,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.