2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Texas v. Cobb.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas v. Cobb Anchor | green | “where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” | 13 |
| 2 | United States v. Red Bird | green | “identical essential elements when compared with the later federal charges filed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.