2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Steven J. Albrechtsen v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Cross-Appellee, and H. Gaylon Greenhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steven J. Albrechtsen v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Cross-Appellee, and H. Gaylon Greenhill Anchor | green | “courts are entitled to assistance from counsel, and an invitation to search without guidance is no more useful than a litigant's request to a district court at the summary judgment stage to paw through the assembled discovery material.” | 11 |
| 2 | United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie, Ill. | green | “it was not the district court's job to sift through the record and make connor's case for him.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.