4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Diggs v. Owens.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diggs v. Owens Anchor | green | “an attorney is presumed to possess skill and knowledge in sufficient degree to preserve the reliability of the adversarial process and afford his client the benefit of a fair trial. consequently, judicial scrutiny of an attorney's competence is highly deferential” | 3 |
| 2 | Lipsey v. Federal Deposit Insurance | green | “an attorney is presumed to possess skill and knowledge in sufficient degree to preserve the reliability of the adversarial process and afford his client the benefit of a fair trial. consequently, judicial scrutiny of an attorney's competence is highly deferential” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.