4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Pedraza.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Pedraza Anchor | green | “a resentencing proceeding is an entirely different animal that does not implicate the sixth amendment concerns that drove the booker remedy.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Jimmy Dale Lee | green | “other policy statements in the sentencing guidelines must be examined separately in the context of their statutory basis and their accompanying commentary.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Petties | green | “explicitly references the applicability of sentencing commission policy statements.” | 3 |
| 4 | Ford v. Ford Motor Credit Corp. | green | “legislative history is often murky, ambiguous, and contradictory, and the court should resort to it only when a statute's plain language is unclear.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.